Tools

DOWN AGAIN

By Charlie Sykes

The budget, the deficit, the economy, the arrogance...The One hit new low in new Marist poll.

Independent voters see Pres. Obama in a negative light by a nearly 2-1 margin, according to a new Marist College survey, while almost half of voters say he has failed to meet their expectations.

The poll, conducted Feb. 1-3, showed just 44% of registered voters approving of Obama's job as president. 47% disapprove. But among indie voters, Obama's approval rating sits at a terrible 29%, while his disapproval rating is at 57%.

Obama's 44% job approval rating is the lowest he has scored in any non-internet poll since moving into the WH, according to a review of data compiled by Pollster.com.

And while GOPers strive to avoid attacking Obama personally, for fear of offending voters who see him in a favorable light personally, even that aura of invincibility is wearing off. Independent voters view Obama negatively, too, by a 39% favorable to 52% unfavorable margin. All registered voters still see Obama favorably by a 50%-44% margin, but that's down 5 points in just 2 months.

Voters are disappointed in what they got with Obama's first year. The poll shows 47% believe Obama has failed to meet their expectations -- including a quarter of Dems, 65% of GOPers and 53% of indie voters -- while just 42% say he has met their expectations. 38% say Obama's policies are moving the country in the wrong direction, while 37% say they're making the country better.

**

Gallup finds them same thing...

The political need for Obama to make such a bold move is underscored by his relatively low 36% approval rating on his handling of healthcare. Obama’s healthcare approval rating is statistically little different from the 37% he received last month, but the two ratings are the lowest of his administration.

Americans give Obama his lowest rating, 32%, on handling the federal budget deficit, down from 38% when this was last measured in September. His ratings on the deficit have trailed his overall approval rating each time they have been measured. In late March, for example, Obama received 49% approval on handling the deficit while at the same time his overall approval rating was above 60%.

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 8:57 PM Walt MADDOG wrote ...

Tea parties are good, that was my suggestion; that’s how I use to find my wife at the mall until we got walkie-talkies. Took her to the very first one in Madison last April and the one in Milwaukee down by the War memorial and she can’t wait for the next one.

37404436 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 8:50 PM Walt to fmff and MADDOG wrote ...

Count me in. I work in a place that is crawling with liberals that don’t like coming into my office very much because I have a VERY BIG photo of Ronald Reagan over my desk. They stare at me in the hallway like I’m wearing a loincloth with horns coming out of my head. Name the place and date.

37404161 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 6:12 PM MADDOG wrote ...

I believe the plan was to show up to a tea party with red balloons so we could find each other at one point. Not sure what happened to that idea. But I'm quite sure there will be more tea parties to try that out.

37396611 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 6:10 PM MADDOG to fmff wrote ...

That would be cool. I could use a beer right about now. Not much of a drinker but that's not to say I NEVER do.

37396447 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 4:38 PM fmff to Walt and MADDOG wrote ...

I would gladly like to tip a few with you guys sometime, as reality, as you both firmly have a grasp on, as bitter as it can be, is just what it is -- and a few every now and then seems to soften what contempt we have for the dodo heads who live amongst us. And Walt, a statment in your last post explains my abbreviated moniker -- I think you can figure it out, godspeed.

37391604 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 4:12 PM LD to reign wrote ...

Wow, what a clever and substantive rebuttal. However shall I cope? While the distinction may be lost on those feeble minded people so terrified of big, bad Fox, no cable news outlet can take control of your life, your health care, your income, your mortgage, your 401k, your energy usage, etc... The Federal government can (and is actively trying to do so). You might want to see someone about that paranoia of yours.....

37389998 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 3:37 PM reign wrote ...

oh here we go again! the evil democrats are trying to take over our lives and strip us of freewill..oops that's FOX NEWS!!

37387834 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 11:59 AM MADDOG wrote ...

Right on Walt and LD.

37372308 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 11:46 AM Walt to reign wrote ...

No matter how you try spinning a time when a past president “raised taxes” during his presidency trying to convince yourself that Obama isn’t the only one to do it; YOU are grossly missing the point because Obama (and his party) are not just raising taxes beyond anything this country has ever seen but he is trying to take control of everything that America is. He is trying to destroy the free market, regulate all human activity and make sure that all Americans are beholding to him and his party

37371231 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 11:41 AM LD wrote ...

Tax cuts do NOT increase the deficit. Spending too much money increases the deficit. Period. JFK, Reagan and Bush 43 all cut income tax rates and revenues to the government increased EVERY time. Anyone with a brain knows this. Obama and the Democrats know it - they are just more interested in having control over our lives than they are interested in revenue or jobs or economic growth. The spending side of the equation is the only side that appeals to them.

37370747 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 10:49 AM reign wrote ...

my point is that raising taxes is bad, but you act like O'BAMA is the ony one to do it! and the no-fly zone crap WAS NOT THE REASON WE INVADED! we were looking for wmd's and NEVER,EVER found any! and all of his tax-cuts and wars did'nt justify jacking up the deficit!

37366856 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 10:14 AM Some Dead White Guys wrote ...

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes.

37364212 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:53 AM LD to reign wrote ...

Deficits come from spending too much - not from taxes being too low. Tax cuts increased revenue. Read YOUR history books. In trying to defend Obama by saying Reagan and Bush raised taxes you avoid the point that all tax increases are a drag on the economy - whoever does it. You also ignore the fact that Reagan CUT many taxes, a fact which led to a twenty plus year period of economic expansion. Obama is Carter II. Let's hope another Reagan is on the horizon to salvage the wreckage BO will leave.

37362556 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:46 AM Walt to reign wrote ...

I didn’t say Iraq was involved with 911, that was Afghanistan you moron. Iraq was still firing on coalition aircraft in the north and south No-Fly Zones and he kicked out the UN inspectors rattling sabers or more war in that area. By the way it’s Congress who holds America’s purse strings, all the president can do is veto what Congress wants to spend. Reagan also had Tip O’Neill to contend with in the House, remember how O’Neill hated Reagan’s threats to veto tax increases from Congress?

37362073 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:44 AM @reign wrote ...

If you make it through a history book, move next to one on civics. Pay particular attention to the part about the legislative process for raising taxes. You're entitled to your opinions, no matter how goofy. Your "facts" however, are largely wrong.

37361892 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:38 AM reign wrote ...

say what you will,but i have my opinion and facts that you do not like. and in atypical republican fashion..you critcize and cut me off!

37361484 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:35 AM @reign wrote ...

Try reading the post you're responding to. It might help you not to appear even more foolish than you already do.

37361211 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:28 AM reign wrote ...

iraq was NEVER involved with 911! even "w"'s advisors told him that! and i was not too young too remember RONALD REAGAN! he helped build our miltary up to the pride and dominance we have today( i served in 1984-1988) but it does not change the fact that he JACKED UP TAXES!! read your history books!

37360658 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 9:09 AM Walt to reign wrote ...

I agree with fmff you really need to stop reading those commie manifestos and grow up a little more before attacking the Reagan Presidency; and how the heck did “W” “start two wars”? We went to war with one country WHO ATTACKED US, and another one who attacked one of our allies while continuing to ignore, what 17, United Nations resolutions after they lost the Gulf War. Do you have a history book that was NOT written by George Soros? If so I’d start reading it.

37359041 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 7:29 AM fmff to reign wrote ...

hello, this is not an insult, but you are obviously too young to remember how good we all had it under Ronnie, see Berlin Wall. Just because you read it in a commie manifesto does NOT make it true....best of luck with that growing up thing, we'll see you someday on the light side of the Force...

37352156 Flag for moderation

Wednesday, Feb 10 at 7:23 AM reign wrote ...

don't forget RONALD REAGAN'S massive tax increase. one of the biggest in u.s history. and let's not forget daddy bush"read my lips" big tax increase as well. and also "W" STARTING TWO WARS with tax cuts= you got it, big time deficiT MORON.

37351818 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 11:16 PM Elmer Fudd wrote ...

Letssee 44 take away 38 equals 6. barama is only 6% higher than President Bush was at his lowest. It took Bush 8 years to do that. barama and his misadministration did it in 12 months!

37341453 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 9:09 PM Hank wrote ...

Rasmussen and Gallup (Left-Leaning) report similar results. O'Reilly on Foxsnews reported a poll showing 75% of Americans Angry or Very Angry at the Federals Government. Yeah, they're only polls, but if they're all so consistent, the DEMS should be frightened.

37336166 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 7:38 PM Walt to ijeff wrote ...

One more thing, these liberals that don’t understand how the American passion for less taxes, less spending and a Government that does not micromanage every aspect of our lives doesn’t work here any more; maybe because Americans were just asleep for a little while. Unlike many countries in Europe a Hitler, Marx, Mussolini, Francisco Franco would never get Americans to follow them; with that same ideology I’m convinced that Obama will also fail in this country.

37331886 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 7:14 PM Walt to ijeff wrote ...

I wondered the same thing, the American spirit has always been just the opposite of what Europeans wanted, and that is what made our country the greatest the world has ever seen in the shortest amount of time. Liberals have always pointed to the all the “advantages” that other socialist nations have under socialism not realizing how many of those same people risk life and limb to come to America. Americans are not socialist that’s why our ancestors came to this country in the first place.

37330713 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 5:20 PM ijeff wrote ...

What cracks me up is whoever thought a big government statist with a passion for regulation, spending and taxing would somehow be a success in America of all places? I know 50 plus percent voted for him and I certainly didn't know how much of his agenda he could get passed, but one thing I was absolutely certain of is there was no way his agenda would be good for the country. Liberal democrats are a lost cause, but independents should be ashamed of themselves.

37324379 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 4:04 PM To Mad Max wrote ...

More to the point, (cheap Palin shot aside) why are you worried about a hypothetical candidate from a non-existent party? Just because it's called the 'Tea Party movement' doesn't make it an official political party - despite how hard the liberals are trying to split the opposition. I'd worry more about the fact that, one year in, Obama's opposition is such a fast growing majority. He's killing your party. Go right on believing your lyin' ears. If MSNBC tells you something, it must be so.

37316976 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 2:46 PM MADDOG wrote ...

You're damn straight I hope and pray he fails. Because I LOVE my FREEDOM.

37306041 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 2:11 PM The Underground Conservative wrote ...

Yes, I am proud to admit it; I hope He fails. Miserably and colossally. Why? Because I want America to succeed and if Obama succeeds, America fails.

37300598 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 2:09 PM The Underground Conservative wrote ...

"Can the One stop a free fall with a boffo Feb. 25 performance?" He hasn't had a boffo performance since the campaign. Worst. President. Ever. Yes, worse than Carter.

37300453 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 1:52 PM Anonymous wrote ...

The sheep are getting the message,Sykes is wrong again.I wonder how long it will take him to see the light?

37299178 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 1:15 PM Max wrote ...

"Days after Sarah Palin headlined the nation's first Tea Party convention, a Rasmussen Reports poll released today shows that a generic "Tea Party candidate" would come in third in a theoretical three-way congressional contest." Why would I ever believe my lying eyes when Sean tells me differently.

37296186 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 1:03 PM Anonymous wrote ...

".. can only pray things get better ... hope and pray he fails ..." So in other words, we both want the same thing.

37295461 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:58 PM Walt to dark reign wrote ...

I’ve said nothing before about your communication skills, I was hoping that you would eventually observe others posting here and get a clue, but alas that strategy isn’t working. You are now trying to convince us that Charlie, Fox and now Limbaugh are all a bunch of idiots that should be ignored but who is posting here like a 4th grader calling us “elitist”. An occasional typo is acceptable if you can make a logical point, you can’t seem to do either.

37295126 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:54 PM dark reign wrote ...

nice retort!i believe in this country and can only pray things get better,unlike you ZEALOTS who hope and pray he fails!!

37294764 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:46 PM MADDOG wrote ...

Wrong again reign.

37294162 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:38 PM dark reign wrote ...

fox news and charlie accurate by who's standard? and are you really going to judge me by my"inept" ability to use the keyboard? how very ELITIST of you. if we don't think like you we're all lazy liberals!you right wing puppets only do what your masters limbaugh and sykes tell you, without question. COMPLETE OBEDIENCE is your rule!

37293484 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:16 PM Walt to reign wrote ...

Sorry, your last post only proves that you are NOT really an independent like you say you are. It is just too hard to believe that a Conservative, or even an independent, would be so inept as to be unable to figure out where the “SHIFT” key is on your keyboard. Names of persons, especially Ronald Reagan’s name, should ALWAYS be capitalized, except when you disrespect that person. Only a lazy liberal would try to communicate the way you do.

37291598 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:06 PM MADDOG wrote ...

Try listening fully instead of selectively. And besides the other stations usually won't even let a conservative on their shows so......At least Fox and Charlie let opposing views be heard on their shows. As much as you may not think so.

37290736 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 12:04 PM Walt to reign wrote ...

Boy you really think you got old Walt, don’t you? Yes it is true that I believe more about what Charlie or the Fox news people tell be; liberals like you could never understand why this is true. Please read these next few words very slowly so you can understand, OK? FIRST OFF, Charlie and Fox actually find liberal corruption in our government that you would never hear about otherwise, which is the reason liberals are usually in the dark. SECONDLY, Charlie and Fox have a higher accuracy rating.

37290514 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 11:17 AM reign wrote ...

how in the hell are they fair. as an independent voter( i voted for reagan, toomy thompson over again) in the 10 years i've been watching fox news, they have never, ever said anything good about anyone, ross perot or anyone outside of the gop!!

37286726 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 11:11 AM MADDOG wrote ...

Yes reign they are fair. Why don't you liberals try thinking for YOURSELVES instead of telling us to.

37286278 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 11:03 AM reign wrote ...

hey walt! you represent exactly what i'm saying,you won't beleive them..but you'll believe charlie and FOX NEWS!! gee, we all know how fair they are!!

37285646 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 10:49 AM Walt wrote ...

Normally I don’t like polling data because you ALWAYS have to look into so many variables to find a legitimate one. I automatically eliminate any poll that’s paid for by CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC or others with a liberal political agenda. I don’t like my representatives falling for this liberal gamesmanship, that’s how we got stuck with McCain last year. But, I’m really glad Obama is ignoring his declining poll numbers as he continues to shoot himself in both feet.

37284514 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 10:34 AM Sparky wrote ...

The latest by John Brennan (the "counter-terrorist" czar): If you are against Obama, you support al-Qaeda.

37283471 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 10:00 AM reign wrote ...

they will always be the same, if you keep asking the same people! he is still popular in many places. i would like to know WHERE these are being taken

37280757 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 9:40 AM Paladin wrote ...

When his rating dips to 25%, he gets the Pelousy Award for arrogance & elitism, last won by such greats as John Edwards,Bawnie Fwank, & John "I was for it before I was against it" Kerry. Congratulations, Professor.

37279228 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 8:14 AM WA Dan wrote ...

The far left progressive liberal agenda of Obama and the Dems is showing again and again. America has tried progressivism again and once again they have turned against it.

37273136 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 8:07 AM George Mitchell wrote ...

Yes, this clearly is a sign that Gallup and Marist are manipulating the polls. Can the One stop a free fall with a boffo Feb. 25 performance. Perhaps. Perhaps not.

37272631 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 8:02 AM stresingc wrote ...

Sure any poll can be fixed to make the president look good or bad , but when the results are the same in all of them, there is a reason for it.

37272379 Flag for moderation

Tuesday, Feb 9 at 7:51 AM dark reign wrote ...

any poll can easily be manipulated. to make bush look bad, go in any innercity. to make him look good gom up north. same with o'bama. go in certain parts of the city and he's still a hero! reality people. look into it!

37271882 Flag for moderation

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

620WTMJ and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Summerfest