Milwaukee Weather
WERE THEY MURDERED, OR NOT?By Charlie SykesMust watch. Lawyer for Al Qaeda terrorists won't say whether Americans were murdered on 9/11.
|
|
Thursday, Nov 26 at 9:57 PM Jordan wrote ...
One of the most recent anyway. I am not familiar w/ Bou v. Bush... Ergo, I won't comment about that case... Unlike Anon mind you, he spouts off all the time re: things he knows nothing about...
32726489 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 9:46 PM Jordan wrote ...
McCain-Feingold is our country's most recent unconstitutional piece of crap... And sadly once again, I'll pass this friendly reminder along: talking to a brick wall or a fire hydrant, watching paint dry, urinating directly into a high voltage transformer are all better use of one's time than engaging in a debate with Anonymoron...
32726269 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 12:58 PM Hank wrote ...
Anon, your latest point is really too stupid to argue with (as usual), but I'll basically repeat Walt's point - we don't question the Supreme Court's legitimate role in "interpreting " the Constitution - we are just saying that sometimes the SC makes stupid interpretations, such as on slavery, abortion, and segregation ("separate but equal" was once OK too, according to the SC). That case you cited was stupidly interpreted, and a new SC should repeal it.
32713634 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 11:17 AM Anonymous wrote ...
Walt--Unfortunately, as usual, you are wrong. Since the early 19th Century, this country has functioned on the principle that judges interpret and give meaning to the constitution. You're refusal to accept this principle which is almost as old as the country itself, shows what an unpatriotic boob you are.
32709729 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 10:17 AM Walt to Anonymous wrote ...
Well! I guess the reason you are arguing with yourself is because of your low self esteem and inability to make decisions so by arguing with yourself that is the only way you can get someone to talk to you. By taking both sides of an issue you get people from both sides of that issue posting to your comments. The problem is no on either side of that issue respects what you have to say, because you are so afraid to identify yourself by a common name.
32707651 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 10:05 AM Walt to Anonymous wrote ...
Boy are you a moron, Boumediene v. Bush was not a right set down in our U.S. Constitution it was a judgment by our supreme court, just like the “right” to have an abortion was a court decision or the even further back the “right” to own slaves. These were all bad INTERPRETATIONS of the Constitution by liberal judges or our supreme court. Just because a judge rules something doesn’t mean it is Constitutional.
32707221 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 9:53 AM Walt to Anonymous wrote ...
That is where you are wrong and why you can’t understand my posts. He does NOT have a “right to say what he wants” in our courts. THAT RIGHT is reserved for legal American citizens; this fact has always escaped liberals. This terrorist was captured on the battlefield and has not earned the rights reserved for American citizens under our own Constitution. You have heard of the American Constitution, haven’t you????
32706852 Flag for moderationThursday, Nov 26 at 9:19 AM Anonymous wrote ...
Why is anonymous arguing with himself?
32705709 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 11:38 PM @ The Al-Qaeda Lawyer wrote ...
Yes, about 3000 innocent American citizens, including babies, infants, and children, were murdered on 9/11
32696611 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 11:34 PM Huh? wrote ...
Our "treaties with Al-Qaeda"??? We got no stinking treaties with Al-Qaeda. We don't need no stinking treaties with Al-Qaeda. We want them all dead, OK? Just like they want us dead. They got no stinking rights under our Constitution. What the Heck you talking about, stinking Anon??
32696516 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 9:53 PM Anonymous wrote ...
spare us the pompous, sanctimonious, hypocritical b.s.
32694134 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 5:35 PM Anonymous wrote ...
Don--spoken like a true chicken-hawk.
32685786 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 5:23 PM MADDOG wrote ...
I don't believe the right wingers are trying to do those things to anyone.
32685409 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 5:23 PM MADDOG wrote ...
The right wingers want to deprive everyone of their rights. You mean like the Fairness doctrine for radio? Or the right to decide when we die? Or the right to not go to jail if we opt not to take their non health care?
32685379 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 4:50 PM DOn wrote ...
Boumediene v. Bush was one is a long list of overreaching BS decision of the USSC. Clearly Kennedy wanted to still get invited to all the posh cocktail parties in DC. The other four in the majority are truly hopeless. Thank God one of this morons has retired. It's unfortunate he was replaced by a bigger moron. I guess in the future we should just shoot them all dead on a battlefield else they get constitutional rights.
32684291 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 4:15 PM Becarusaxx @JTR wrote ...
I dont think anyone really care where he graduated from... I think its more the fact he was asked three time to give a statement and instead gave us the run around of BS!
32682909 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 3:26 PM Anonymous wrote ...
For instance, treatment of KSM is governed by our treaties with Al Qaida.
32680864 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 2:57 PM Anonymous wrote ...
you don't have to be a u.s. citizen to have rights under the constitution or under treaties the u.s. is a party to. if you can read, read the u.s. supreme court case Boumediene v. Bush. try to know what you're talking about before spouting off.
32679359 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 2:35 PM OMG - Anony - HELLLO...... wrote ...
They have NO rights!! They are not US citizens.
32678201 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 2:03 PM Anonymous wrote ...
funny that you talk in terms of rights, walt. because you right wing loons always want to deprive others of their rights. you have a right to be offended by him. he has a right to say what he wants. his client has a right to a lawyer and also has the right to a fair trial. hooray, we all have rights!
32676702 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 1:16 PM Walt to Anonymous wrote ...
You know every once in a while even I get suckered in to the liberal “side-step” so rather than take this conversation off topic what about commenting on my original post regarding this lawyer. An old joke goes “how do you tell the difference between a squashed skunk and a squashed lawyer on the road? The skunk has skid marks in front of it.” This LIBERAL “lawyer” is making lots of American dollars by representing other anti-American liberals. I have a right to be offended with this guy.
32674429 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 1:09 PM MADDOG @ Anonymous wrote ...
No that would be a liberal tactic only used here by......wait for it.......LIBERALS!!!!!!!
32673961 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 12:47 PM Anonymous wrote ...
No Walt, the technique you use is to hurl childish insults at people because they disagree with you.
32672554 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 6:52 AM Walt to right is right wrote ...
I realize the redundancy of that comment but when talking about liberals, or to them, you almost have to be redundant to make them understand. When I was a very young child my mom used to use simple words repetitively to try and make her point. When dealing with the simple mind of today’s average day liberal I sometimes need to use that same technique.
32651466 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 6:46 AM MADDOG wrote ...
And with that comment anon you lose any credibility you MIGHT have had left. Which wasn't much if any.
32651231 Flag for moderationWednesday, Nov 25 at 3:54 AM right is right wrote ...
Walt, sorry to have to point this out, but "anti-American liberal" is redundant.
32647819 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 11:36 PM anon wrote ...
they were murdered question is by who, insidejob w bush/ Dick cheney /etc or terrorist will nrver know
32643814 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 10:30 PM Jordan wrote ...
And btw, these BO sycophant libs aren't nice Hank.. think Rahm Emanuel.. They are attempting to destroy this country as it was founded. Get angry and quit worrying about hurting these losers' feelings... They need to be politically annihilated or we are all f-ed... have a nice Thanksgiving everyone!
32641761 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 10:20 PM Jordan to Hank wrote ...
If it ain't time for harsh, it ain't ever gonna be...
32641369 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 9:20 PM Jordan wrote ...
I'm sorry... I'd be honored to kick the ever loving crap out of this weasel even though I suffered no personal 9/11 loss... Question to self: Why did I watch that again? Why oh why aren't I watching old feel good 80's music videos on Youtube or something... Good God, I could use some Bananarama or Tommy Tutone right now....
32639169 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 8:57 PM Hank wrote ...
Well, Jordan's language is a bit harsh, but I essentially agree with him. I have no sympathy for anybody who's unemployed, been "furloughed,", etc. who voted for The Obamanation and the rest of DEM BUMS. I lost a couple of friends during the last election because they didn't want to hear my warnings about this Socialist/Fascist charlatan (Obama) who is responsible for this upcoming stage-show for Al-Qaeda. I wanted to continue the dialog, but my "friends" too were mesmerized by BO to listen.
32638169 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 8:05 PM Jordan wrote ...
And if this skinny little dork weasel lawyer doesn't have a security detail yet, he better soon... If one of my relatives or friends were killed by these sub-human vile vermin (who wanted to be executed btw, to be with Allah or whatever), I'd have an incredibly hard time not beating a smug weasel lawyer like this within an inch of his life. Thanks Lord BO :), this hope and change is just workin’ out swimmingly…
32636206 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 7:52 PM Jordan wrote ...
And this is just the beginning. The only reason this Ringling Brothers side show will occur is because LORD BO wanted it to. The rage that most Americans and certainly 9/11 families felt on that dreadful day should now be directed specifically toward BO. That being said, anyone who suffered personal loss on 9/11 and voted for our Clown in Chief will receive exactly zero sympathy from me while they have to be witness to this filth.
32635681 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 7:05 PM MADDOG to tyrone wrote ...
Ha he usually accuses ME of being just that.
32633594 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 7:03 PM tyrone to anon wrote ...
Ive said it before and I'll say it again but this time with an adendum you are the most santimonious arrogant pri-ck that I have seen. Your comments are so off the wall that you are probably a Sykes writer being paid to be this stupid. There is no other reason for this.You are one sad pathitic person
32633476 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 5:42 PM conservative wrote ...
what's the point of this trial if "they will never let them go" quoting the lawyer.
32629699 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 5:15 PM Andrew wrote ...
He's right, everyone deserves a defense. But every defense doesn't lead to an acquittal. Also, being a lawyer doesn't mean you can't acknowledge that 9/11 involved the MURDER of civilians. You can have this opinion without implicating your client. Get the conspiracy theorists out, apparently these innocent people weren't murdered by Muslim extremist terrorists -- they were murdered by their own evil government. Give me a break.
32628444 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 1:48 PM TJ wrote ...
Anon and all you libs, this guy is one of you, you all must be so proud! commie bastards!
32615491 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 12:45 PM To anony wrote ...
So, do you have any other explanation for this sort of treason?
32610686 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 12:40 PM Jim the Fireman wrote ...
I usually don't pay much attention to BOR. But this time he did a masterful job of not letting this smarmy lawyer duck and dodge. Yet, I heard the slimeball say that the US will never let his clients go free even if a judge throws out the evidence gained that wasn't mirandized. I don't see how the US will be able to constitutionally hold them in prison.
32610271 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 11:57 AM JTR wrote ...
Just wanted to add that this lawyer is a graduate of the Air Force Academy.
32607321 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 10:28 AM Walt to Mark wrote ...
I thought I was quite clear in my post when I used the term “anti-American liberals”. All anti-American liberals are in favor of this atrocity in NY and it appears that all anti-American liberals these days are democrats. JFK is rolling over in his grave right about now.
32601204 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 10:13 AM Anonymous wrote ...
wow amy, i never saw it like that before! thanks for your insight!
32600181 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 9:54 AM Amy L. Geiger-Hemmer wrote ...
Isn't it interesting how liberals will bend over backwards to make sure terrorists "rights" are protected, and that they are given free Korans while in prison, as well as their religion-specific meals? They wring their hands worrying about the comforts of those who want to kill us all, yet are terrified of....Sarah Palin? They will do anything they can to destroy her, yet see nothing wrong with defending those who want to murder us all! Only in "liberal world" does that make sense.
32598924 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 9:54 AM Mark wrote ...
The real weasels, IMO, are the ones who decided that the trial would be in a civilian court in NYC. This attorney is merely a pawn, just doing his job. The focus of our wrath ought to be on the Ones who put him in this position in the first place.
32598879 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 9:35 AM Stephen wrote ...
Oh the intellectual knots liberals will tie themselves into so as to excuse the behavior of terrorists. What arrogance! Weasel behavior is right – and where is Shakespeare when you need him?
32597604 Flag for moderationTuesday, Nov 24 at 9:22 AM WALT wrote ...
This is the reason I am NOT a liberal because I unlike people such as this bottom dwelling sewer microbe or a lawyer, scott fenstermaker, I have functioning brain and considerably more honor and love of country. I can’t even see a human face when I look at anti-American liberals such as this. And no I did not FORGET to capitalize his name for he has not earned that reverence.
32596716 Flag for moderationAdd a comment
Most Popular