Tools

WHO WAS MORE NEGATIVE?

By Charlie Sykes

Obama or Palin? Jim Lindgren runs the numbers.

Monday, Sep 15 at 1:53 PM Barbara wrote ...

To both James and Mike - Apparently, both of you have no clue or idea what the meaning of "negative" is or you would being sounding Negative yes, John McCain.

Saturday, Sep 6 at 10:02 AM James Wigderson wrote ...

It's a worthless comparison, anyway. Vice Presidents traditionally attack. Senator Obama's acceptance speech was the most negative of any major party nominee in the modern era of the political convention, possibly ever. But that's not surprising given his whole Raison d'être is negative, a negative reaction to Bush with no positive agenda. Any wonder why his supporters are so vicious about Palin?

Saturday, Sep 6 at 9:41 AM Whitefish Bay Mike wrote ...

Politics is a bloodsport in my mind, win at any cost, then become bipartisn later. Obama’s negatives are rising, FAST... The best time to kick an opponent is ALWAYS when he’s down. I want Sarah to keep pounding Obama like a field mule, you can tell it's getting under his skin. In frustration Obama will soon say something that will end his Whitehouse run.

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

620WTMJ and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.