Story Created:
Apr 22, 2008
Story Updated:
Apr 22, 2008
An interesting take from a British journalist on Obama's elitist gaffe:
"It's not surprising that they get bitter, that they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy to people who aren't like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."
In , such sentiments about working-class people are expressed every day by politicians of all parties. They are the common currency of the patronising Left-wing snobbery that pours out of every orifice of the BBC.
Indeed, in the terms that Mr Obama gave to them, they would be seen as the kinder paternalistic version of the disdain that takes really visceral forms in more robustly contemptuous circles (for which organs such as the Guardian speak).
He clearly believed himself to be offering a sympathetic account of why Americans in (or out of) blue-collar jobs turned into gun-totin', Bible-bashing, benighted bigots. And given that he was addressing what was supposed to be a closed fund-raising meeting in
San Francisco , we must assume that he believed himself to be among friends who would all discuss the redneck issue with frank loathing: by their standards he was being pretty gentle.
Since the Sixties, when a diluted and incoherent Marxist ideology took hold of higher education, and university became a Left-liberal sheep-dip through which every middle-class professional had to pass, respectability in America has generally involved contempt for precisely the people Mr Obama characterised as being so ignorant that they could not even understand the causes of their economic disadvantage.
In her analysis of this farrago, the Wall Street Journal's Peggy Noonan has written: "To rise in is to turn left, unless you are very, very tough or protected by privilege of the financial or familial kind."
In other words, if you are somebody who came up from poverty, you cannot afford to buck the intellectual hegemony of right-thinking people (which is to say, Left-thinking people).
So yes, the has discovered bourgeois guilt. It now has an educated class that believes, in the face of all the comparative evidence, that Big Government and enforced wealth redistribution must be the answers to poverty and that the wealth that is created by free markets is somehow tainted.
To hold on to socially or economically conservative views in this climate is to risk appearing backward - common, vulgar and comically downmarket.
While there is certainly a flourishing intellectual movement of the Right in , it still takes real nerve to risk any association with the opinions of those who (as the old redneck joke goes) think that a family reunion is a great place to meet girls....
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 6:23 PM Maddie - Saukville wrote ...
I say Janet old girl, cracking good read and jolly good show.
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 10:53 AM Locke wrote ...
Crazy said, "The liberal idealogy has been so discredited and proven to not work you would wonder how peope can be so duped?" Reality-based community my butt. The answer of course is because it makes them FEEL better. It doesn't matter if their programs and philosophy actually work only that their sense of guilt is appeased.
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 9:35 AM Kurt/Elkhorn wrote ...
When we look into the liberal past, we see images of Kerry("war hero"), Clinton("I never had sex...."), Jimmy Carter(went to Syria... for what!), Hanoi Jane Fonda,etc. Why expect anything different.
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 9:13 AM Zach in Beloit wrote ...
Why are Americans so afraid of Europeans. I think it is funny that we would be making fun of their economic and political choices when they seem to be ascending to the top of the worlds economies.
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 6:40 AM ijeff wrote ...
I think he gets it! The liberal idealogy has been so discredited and proven to not work you would wonder how peope can be so duped? Until recently they didn't even remember Hillary was fundamentally dishonest. No surprise they don't remember Ronald Reagan and the success of pro-growth economic policies in the 80's. It will be a sad day if this Country once again falls for protectionism, non-growing economic pie, national defense weakness and high taxes on "other" people.
Tuesday, Apr 22 at 6:17 AM Crazy Politico wrote ...
Welcome back. Obama actually pointed out (unknowingly) one of the big flaws of the Democrat's "for the little guy" mantra. Their policy is designed for the "little guy" by academics and elitists who think they know what that guy must want. Maybe the should actually dump those folks, and hire some working people to develop their policy. It might be more in step with reality. (It probably wouldn't hurt the GOP either)
Add a comment
Most Popular