Tools

UPDATE: ***SMEARING ALBERTA DARLING?

By Charlie Sykes

UPDATE: State Rep. Sheldon Wasserman appeared on my show this morning and repudiated the whispering campaign and put out this statement afterward (it has a VERY different tone from the statement attributed to him yesterday.)

I had no part in the spreading of this rumor about Senator Darling’s health, and I would NEVER make an individual’s personal health an issue in my campaign. I was not in the room when the accusations were made. In fact, this was the first announcement I have heard that she had breast cancer. I am happy to hear she is doing well and I wish her well in her continued recovery. As a Doctor, I have the utmost respect for the people who battle and beat life threatening illness, and I will repudiate anyone who makes it an issue in this campaign.”

***

f this is true, it is one of the most despicable -- and stupid -- smears in local political history.

Senator Darling puts out press release charging her opponents with waging a "negative smear campaign spreading lies about Darling's health."

It has come to my attention that Sheldon Wasserman’s campaign has been complicit in spreading a lie that I have been ‘struggling with health problems.’

“For Sheldon Wasserman, a doctor, to allow lies to be spread about the health of a 63-year-old breast cancer survivor and imply I’m unfit to run for office is a real slap in the face to women my age and to cancer survivors. He’s shown a complete lack of ethical standards, yet I continue to pledge to not stoop to such personal attacks.

“Milwaukee Magazine recently published unsubstantiated gossip from an un-identified source that I am ‘struggling with health problems.’ The editor later acknowledged the failure to back up this claim and has printed a statement pointing out the mistake.

“Democrat Senate Majority Leader Russ Decker publicly spread this lie while promoting Sheldon Wasserman and his campaign to a gathering of Madison lobbyists on April 2. Yesterday, Wasserman’s Senate Democrat Campaign Committee further perpetuated this lie by stating to the media that ‘Senator Darling no longer seems to be up to the task.’

“The truth is, I’m physically fit and in very good health, and I challenge anyone to keep up with my aggressive schedule meeting face-to-face with constituents. I’m going door-to-door in addition to attending community functions and meeting with people at numerous town hall meetings.

“As a doctor, one should expect Sheldon Wasserman to uphold an ethical standard to not allow lies to be spread about somebody’s health. This sort of gutter politics will be widely rejected by the good people residing in my district.

**

Wasserman offers no apology.

It’s unfortunate that Senator Darling is so desperate that she is making such baseless claims. I would expect more from our Senator. I have never said she was unfit for office because of her health problems. I have said that she is unfit for office because of her flip flopping on issues important to the district.

I am happy to hear that her health is good. I have never brought up or implied anything about Senator Darling’s health. In fact she quotes the source of the story as a Milwaukee Magazine article that ran several weeks ago and is just now being refuted. The real question is why did it take her so long to bring up this story.

Question here: if Wasserman is not "implying" anything... what is he trying to imply with his last line?


Wednesday, Sep 10 at 9:39 PM Bridget Smith wrote ...

I totally back Sheldon Wasserman 110%. He is a great man and I have known him for over 12 years. He is decent and kind and he only has the peoples best interests in his mind. I would like to see him as president some day. People who are out there smearing his name and his reputation should be ashamed of themselves. Get to know a person and then form your opinion. I say Go Sheldon and you will always have my vote.

Friday, Apr 11 at 7:59 AM Dan in Sheboygan wrote ...

Knock off the smearing...Too bad Sheldon's a liberal. Seriously, he wouldn't smear...I actually know him...can any of you say the same?

Thursday, Apr 10 at 8:45 PM But wait, there's more wrote ...

"I had no part in the spreading of this rumor about Senator Darling’s health, and I would NEVER make an individual’s personal health an issue in my campaign." - Sheldon Wasserman 4-10-08 "Citing health reasons, Darling recently admitted that she would not be able to knock on any doors this cycle.” - State Senate Democratic Committee Campaign Briefing, 4-2-08 We're to believe Wasserman knew NOTHING about this smear on Darling that was carried out on his behalf by his Democrat colleagues?

Thursday, Apr 10 at 6:58 PM Peter THEB wrote ...

Wasserman could stop it directly with a phone call to the Senate Democrat Campaign Committee and demand that they retract the smear. The fact that he hasn't tells me he knows he stands to benefit from it.

Thursday, Apr 10 at 6:53 PM Crabby Patty wrote ...

The questions been raised, however, and Darling probably won't survive the fallout.

Thursday, Apr 10 at 6:48 PM james wigderson wrote ...

Can you imagine if Republicans had made an issue of Peg Lautenschlager's health?

Thursday, Apr 10 at 5:23 PM Fraley wrote ...

Charlie, note that he says "Because of her health problems." What a cad. I have in my hands and on dailytakes dot com the document the Senate Dems were handing out that lies about Darling's health. http://www.dailytakes.com

Thursday, Apr 10 at 4:22 PM Whitefish Bay/Mike wrote ...

In my opinion Rep. Wasserman is a weasle, I don't trust him at all. He marches up and down the streets of Whitefish Bay like he owns it. I am not surprised at all by his whispering campaign against Sen. Darling, it's just like him.

Thursday, Apr 10 at 9:13 AM Ed in Escanaba wrote ...

It isn't either of the politicians reactions that surprises me here. Senator Darling using a wide brush to paint Dr Wasserman directly. Rep. Wasserman should take responsibility for anything said on behalf of his campaign. It is the Milwaukee Magazine that surprises me. I know that the press will do what it can to protect sources, but they are not required to do so. If I were an editor, I would make it clear that if you give me a false lead, you will be outed....

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 500 Characters Left

Comments are moderated and will not appear on this story until after they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

620WTMJ and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.