skip to nav skip to content

FPO

Charlie Sykes: Sykes Writes

HEALTH CARE UPDATE II: THE RATIONING COMMISSION

  • (21) | COMMENTS
  • Print

Rationing Commission? What Rationing Commission? The Wall Sreet Journal has the details.

In other words, the Medicare commission would come to function much like the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, which rations care in England. Or a similar Washington state board created in 2003 to control costs. Its handiwork isn't pretty.

The Washington commission, called the Health Technology Assessment, is manned by 11 bureaucrats, including a chiropractor and a "naturopath" who focuses on alternative, er, remedies like herbs and massage therapy. They consider the clinical effectiveness but above all the cost of medical procedures and technologies. If they decide something isn't worth the money, then Olympia won't cover it for some 750,000 Medicaid patients, public employees and prisoners.

So far, the commission has banned knee arthroscopy for osteoarthritis, discography for chronic back pain, and implantable infusion pumps for pain not related to cancer. This year, it is targeting such frivolous luxuries as knee replacements, spinal cord stimulation, a specialized autism therapy and MRIs of the abdomen, pelvis or breasts for cancer. It will also rule on routine ultrasounds for pregnancy, which have a "high" efficacy but also a "high" cost.

Currently, the commission is pushing through the most restrictive payment policy in the nation for drug-eluting cardiac stents—simply because bare metal stents are cheaper, even as they result in worse outcomes. If a patient is wheeled into the operating room with chest pains in an emergency, doctors will first have to determine if he's covered by a state plan, then the diameter of his blood vessels and his diabetic condition to decide on the appropriate stent. If they don't, Washington will not reimburse them for "inappropriate care."

If Democrats impose such a commission nationwide, it would constitute a radical change in U.S. health care.

21 COMMENTS

ADD A COMMENT

  1. And this is what AARP backs. soon if you reach 65 you will be restricted to only taking aspirin for all late in life problems.....
  2. So they'll rule out "routine ultrasounds" and prefer to kill the newborn if he's in any way defective and, therefore, costly to the state. All hail hope, change, and death!
  3. Commissions good, panels bad.
  4. This is Big Brother watching! Correct?

Storm Team 4

    advertisement

    620 WTMJ