Anti-Israel activists bully student newspaper over story on hatefest.
Bottomline: The reporter's account seems to be accurate and is supported by the editor of another paper that covered the same event. The editor's excuse for caving in to the pressure by pro-islamist activists is beyond weak; the "sourcing" issue is merely a pretext for surrendering to the campus PC bullies.
**
I think that Savannah accurately captured the tenor of the event.
Also, please note that my piece was an opinion piece. FYI.
Elana
Elana Kahn-Oren
Editor
Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle
Dear Mr. Sykes,
The story was retracted because the quotes were not verifiable. The reporter was asked if she had audio of the story and didn't respond to messages asking if a recording existed. I allowed the story to run without hearing from her and without being able to verify the existence of an audio recording.
This is inconsistent with The UWM Post's usual standard of having sources that can be fact-checked for news story. In the past, especially in the case of a controversial topic, the Post has required audio recording of these kinds of discussions and forums. I take complete responsibility for not making sure that audio of the
It's my opinion that the story shouldn't have run in the first place. The retraction did not claim inaccuracies in the story. It simply claimed that the story did not have adequate sourcing....
Thanks,
Kevin Lessmiller
Editor in Chief

22 COMMENTS
ADD A COMMENT
VIEW ALL COMMENTS
James - Nov 05, 2009 11:34 AM
Tim - Nov 05, 2009 11:40 AM
Renee - Nov 05, 2009 12:05 PM
8rent - Nov 05, 2009 12:35 PM
What a coward, and what an embarrassment for UWM.
VIEW ALL COMMENTS