skip to nav skip to content

FPO

Charlie Sykes: Sykes Writes

THURSDAY HOT READ: WHAT ABOUT THE NEXT VICTIM?

  • (16) | COMMENTS
  • Print

Patrick McIlheran is apparently not oozing with the milk of human kindness over teenagers who rape elderly women.

Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court will be told that no young man can be as bad as Joe Sullivan, not even Joe Sullivan.

Sullivan was 13 when he broke into a house in Florida to rob it and, as long as he was at it, rape the 72-year-old woman living there. This came after 17 prior convictions for burglary, assault and such. A judge decided Sullivan was impervious to rehabilitation and, to protect Florida, sentenced him to life without parole.

This, justices will hear, was unconstitutional. Sullivan's lawyer will argue that it's cruel to decide a 13-year-old must be locked up forever. Groups that campaign on behalf of young criminals hope the court will rule such sentences impermissible. "You can never make that kind of judgment about a juvenile," wrote Sullivan's lawyer.

Never? Not even after 17 prior convictions? One seldom hears so pure an expression of the viewpoint. Rather, those advocating for the worst young criminals rest their arguments on the premise that an unduly harsh America is willy-nilly discarding children....

16 COMMENTS

ADD A COMMENT

  1. Chance after chance and excuse after excuse is afforded to too many of these monsters. He lived in a violent neighborhood, his mother didn't nurse him, he played too many video games, watched too many violent movies...Some people are just not fit to live among the rest of us and some of them start out early. I often wonder who told them it was OK to do such things? Perhaps WE do by making excuses for them.
  2. What would Jesus do?
  3. The little monster will eventually go on to kill people. Just kill him first to avoid that.
  4. I have to admit being a little uneasy with life without parole for a 13 year old. That's not to say severe punishment fitting the severity of the crime and considerating his prior crimes and behavior is not proper. But it's troubling to say the least, that by as early as 13 years, a person can be so "locked in" as to make them beyond rehabilitation. I'm not saying it might not be true - I don't know. But I sure as heck hope not. Again, I have no problem with a very long time. But forever?

Storm Team 4

    advertisement

    620 WTMJ