The New York Times refuses to run a column by New York's new archbishop, Timothy Dolan. But Dolan is a hard man to shut up.
Here's some of what the Times didn't want to publish:
Finally, the most combustible example of all came Sunday with an intemperate and scurrilous piece by Maureen Dowd on the opinion pages of the Times. In a diatribe that rightly never would have passed muster with the editors had it so criticized an Islamic, Jewish, or African-American religious issue, she digs deep into the nativist handbook to use every anti-Catholic caricature possible, from the Inquisition to the Holocaust, condoms, obsession with sex, pedophile priests, and oppression of women, all the while slashing Pope Benedict XVI for his shoes, his forced conscription -- along with every other German teenage boy -- into the German army, his outreach to former Catholics, and his recent welcome to Anglicans.
True enough, the matter that triggered her spasm -- the current visitation of women religious by Vatican representatives -- is well-worth discussing, and hardly exempt from legitimate questioning. But her prejudice, while maybe appropriate for the Know-Nothing newspaper of the 1850’s, the Menace, has no place in a major publication today.

42 COMMENTS
ADD A COMMENT
VIEW ALL COMMENTS
Amy P. - Nov 02, 2009 11:22 AM
Papa Z - Nov 02, 2009 12:11 PM
Mary F. - Nov 02, 2009 1:09 PM
- Nov 02, 2009 3:46 PM
VIEW ALL COMMENTS