skip to nav skip to content

FPO

Charlie Sykes: Sykes Writes

MONDAY HOT READ: LIMBAUGH BAD. MAO GOOD.

  • (22) | COMMENTS
  • Print

Mark Steyn on the new standards of acceptability. 

Here is a tale of two sound bites. First:

"Slavery built the South. I'm not saying we should bring it back; I'm just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark."

Second:

"The third lesson and tip actually comes from two of my favorite political philosophers, Mao Tse Tung and Mother Teresa. Not often coupled with each other, but the two people that I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point, which is: You're going to make choices. ... But here's the deal: These are your choices; they are no one else's. In 1947, when Mao Tse Tung was being challenged within his own party on his own plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army. … They had everything on their side. And people said 'How can you win? How can you do this against all of the odds against you?' And Mao Tse Tung says, 'You fight your war, and I'll fight mine.' You don't have to accept the definition of how to do things. … You fight your war, you let them fight theirs. Everybody has their own path."

The first quotation was attributed to Rush Limbaugh. He never said it. There is no tape of him saying it. There is no transcript of him saying it. After all, if he had done so at any point in the past 20 years, someone would surely have mentioned it at the time.

Yet CNN, MSNBC, ABC and other networks and newspapers all around the country cheerfully repeated the pro-slavery quotation and attributed it, falsely, to Rush Limbaugh. And planting a flat-out lie in his mouth wound up getting Rush bounced from a consortium hoping to buy the St. Louis Rams. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said the talk-show host was a "divisive" figure, and famously nondivisive figures like the Rev. Al Sharpton and the Rev. Jesse Jackson expressed the hope that, with Mr. Divisive out of the picture, the NFL could now "unify."

The second quotation – hailing Mao – was uttered back in June to an audience of high school students by Anita Dunn, the White House communications director. I know she uttered it because I watched the words issuing from her mouth on "The Glenn Beck Show" on Fox News. But don't worry. Nobody else played it.

So if I understand correctly:

Rush Limbaugh is so "divisive" that to get him fired Leftie agitators have to invent racist sound bites to put in his mouth.

But the White House communications director is so undivisive that she can be invited along to recommend Chairman Mao as a role model for America's young

22 COMMENTS

ADD A COMMENT

  1. Freedom of speech has now turned to Agreement of your speech. If we don't agree with what you say and you don't speak glowingly of us then we will try to destroy you even if we have to make it up!
  2. Where is false speech permitted? There is a lot of jealousy in the media. I believe if being a part owner was worth it, Rush would have pursued it more.
  3. Can't Rush sue for slander?
  4. What Limbaugh said or didn't say really isn't the point. The point is if he was accepted as an owner he would be a distraction going forward. The NFL does not need or want that. I can't imagine other owners of the Rams wanting that. If he said on the radio I think the President is a jerk, then sportswriters would ask players what do you think of your owner calling the President a jerk. Might not be fair but from a business standpoint not worth it.

Storm Team 4

    advertisement

    620 WTMJ