skip to nav skip to content

FPO

Charlie Sykes: Sykes Writes

FRIDAY HOT READ: OUR DISTRACTED CIC

  • (8) | COMMENTS
  • Print

Charles Krauithammer on the incoherence of The One.

Many have charged that President Obama's decision to begin withdrawing from Afghanistan 10 months from now is hampering our war effort. But now it's official. In a stunning statement last week, Marine Corps Commandant James Conway admitted that the July 2011 date is "probably giving our enemy sustenance."

A remarkably bold charge for an active military officer. It stops just short of suggesting aiding and abetting the enemy. Yet the observation is obvious: It is surely harder to prevail in a war that hinges on the allegiance of the locals when they hear the U.S. president talk of beginning a withdrawal that will ultimately leave them to the mercies of the Taliban.

How did Obama come to this decision? "Our Afghan policy was focused as much as anything on domestic politics," an Obama adviser told the New York Times' Peter Baker. "He would not risk losing the moderate to centrist Democrats in the middle of health insurance reform and he viewed that legislation as the make-or-break legislation for his administration."

If this is true, then Obama's military leadership can only be called scandalous.

8 COMMENTS

ADD A COMMENT

  1. Barry, the War on Terror is not a video game! It's real.
  2. Wait until General Petraeus breaks bad on him in 2012. Can't wait for that book.
  3. We're going to pull troops out of Afghanistan because he thinks that will save his Health care bill? Unacceptable!
  4. Dan B., the war is especially real to the soldiers and families, including those in Wisconsin who lost sons recently. The announced deadline was a signal of non-support for the war. We should have begun a unilateral w/drawal the following day. To put American troops in this position is, as Krauthamer says, scandalous.

Storm Team 4

    advertisement

    620 WTMJ