skip to nav skip to content

FPO

Charlie Sykes: Sykes Writes

WEDNESDAY HOT READ: LOST IN THE MUDDLE

  • (33) | COMMENTS
  • Print

Fred Kaplan (no conservative) from Slate on The one's speech last night;

President Barack Obama's speech from the Oval Office Tuesday night was a strange muddle—a televised prime-time address that lacked a bottom line, a consistent theme, a clear road to the future.

He announced the end of combat operations in Iraq, right on schedule. But he equivocated on what comes next in that much-improved but still war-torn land.

On the one hand: "There should be no doubt the Iraqi people will have a strong partner in the United States; our combat mission is ending, but our commitment to Iraq's future is not."

On the other hand: "Through this remarkable chapter in the history of the United States and Iraq, we have met our responsibility. Now, it is time to turn the page."

On the one hand: "Because of the drawdown in Iraq, we are now able to apply the resources necessary to go on offense [in Afghanistan]."

On the other hand: "As we wind down the war in Iraq, we must tackle those challenges at home [jobs, deficits, energy independence, and education] with as much energy and grit and sense of common purpose as our men and women in uniform who have served abroad."

On the one hand: "No challenge is more essential to our security than our fight against al-Qaida."

On the other hand: "Our most urgent task is to restore our economy and put the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs back to work. … [This] must be our central mission as a people and my central responsibility as president."

None of this is wrong. All the pieces of what he said are worth saying. But what was he saying overall? Which pieces did he mean to emphasize most? What made the message worth the high profile of a prime-time address to the nation? (His last speech from the Oval Office, dealing with the BP crisis, also fell a bit flat. Maybe he should accept that his strengths aren't served by the format.)

33 COMMENTS

ADD A COMMENT

  1. If anything, we liberals are a varied group and tend less to follow orders like our friends on the other side.

    The name of the President by the way is Barack Obama, and this president is in a hell of a spot, thanks to the ineptitude and criminality of the previous clique. At least he is winding this thing down. It is doubtful that Bush would have ended this war, because he has too many private mouths to feed.

    Let's not forget who made this mess possible, and also who supported it.
  2. ...except Obama is just following the path that Bush negotiated with the Iraqi government.

    So should Obama state he inherited the plan to withdraw from Bush as well?

    And what "inherit" any way. He ran for the job claiming he could do better. Regan fixed Carter's mess, Obama is making the mess worse.

    Maybe there need to be pictures of Carter with the "Miss me yet?" slogan.
  3. This hippie president doesn't know the real meaning of combat. If he was in my unit during WWII and did not want to fight, I'd slap him and called him a chicken.
  4. I had the same thoughts as he talked. I assumed he went back and forth so whatever he does in future, he can cite that he said he would do it. Double talk expert. Words, just words.

Storm Team 4

    advertisement

    620 WTMJ